Every student that receives his bachelor or master degree faces the “hangover” of college time, namely “the crossroad”, in which you have to choose what your next step would be.
exit 1: find a job exit 2: go and explore the world exit 3: start your own company
The exit I took a couple of weeks ago is irrelevant, since I decided to work according to the principle of Seth Godin; does your passion matches your job (exit). I mean that I am not taking an exit that is expected by my social environment in order to fit in. I am not taking a job for a job or starting a company for just having a company. I refuse to be a sheep and follow the herd, I want to life my life, my route, my passion.
Companies like Zappos could then be an interesting company to work for or start my own company immediatly and thus draw my own route. However, companies as Zappos from blocknotes 2 are unfortunately not in the majority in this world. While when I have my own company I still have to work with “sheeps” who work at my customers. Nevertheless, there is hope when you are an opportunity thinker from the “new world” and not a worker that accepts to be a faceless cog in a machinery of the “old world”. In the “new world” companies you are granted to draw your own route at your job as long as you create customer value. The only joy an employee from an “old world” company experiences is when he can put a tick at the box after his final task of the day is done.
Oke, Mike nice story, but what is your point?
My point is that more and more “old world” companies are pretending to be aware of the reason why social media is so popular, but still ignore that they don’t reward their employees in being unique. For decades employees did standardised tasks without creating a lasting customer relation, since the employee would otherwise be hard to replace. In short, it would make the company dependent on their employees and therefore they decided to standardize all tasks. Think of a flight attendant standing at the exit and saying the standardized bye bye’s like a robot, while see could make an lasting customer relation. Flight attendants could make their own facebook page, where they could share their do and don’t for each destination and say to every passenger when leaving the plane “add us on facebook at www.facebook.com/****airflightattendents”. However, this behaviour is not perceived as normal and therefore not desirable in this standardised world.
Nevertheless there is hope, like the example of Hyatt Hotels that empowers their employees to draw their own route by being generous to their best customers. Employees can decide to offer free services in which they normally charge for (like messages). However, the employees decide which free service, since they know who are the best customers and what services they enjoy. Long term customer satisfaction is therefore prioritised over short term cash, since they know that this story is shared with others and for that reason become an unique characteristic of the Hyatt brand.
But again, it’s the need to be remarkable that is stimulating us in this new world, trendwatching.com named it already our statussphere. Every company/employee should just draw their own route to create value. Jean-Baptiste Colbert did it already in the 1600’s and the French are still benefiting from the route he decided to take for his country. At that time the world was colonized by all superpowers except France, but in order to remain a superpower, France had to create a unique value-maker. France decided to embrace the handmade luxery industry, while the rest of the world embraced anonymous factories. In short, let other countries find the raw materials in every continent and the French would fashion, brand and sell it back to them as high priced goods (e.g. Louis Vuitton, Hermes). “Made in France” became a brand with lasting value. In short, just by daring to be different creates a brand that is cherished by your customers ( but that’s no rocket science).
To conclude, I, you, we, the world is creating their own map in order to stand out in our statussphere via the social media platforms without the influence of “old world” companies . Former CEO of British ASDA Andy Bond named it “democratic consumerism”, which is the lack of consumer trust in large companies that causes this gap . According to his opinion the development of social media was the cause, but it was just the advancements we made as a human beings. Seth Godin summarised our need in chronical order: lift, hunt, grow, produce, sell, connect and currently create and invent. The real cause was the lack of remarkable people that worked for the “old world” companies who weren’t stimulated to put emotional labour into their job. The lack of value creators for a brands had caused this “democratic consumerism”, since unlike Hyatt almost all companies prefered to standardize the tasks for their employees and banish remarkable value creators.
My passion equals being the sheep in front of the herd, but it could be that you have an other unique passion. However, my point is that you execute this passion in the new world and draw your own route like Jean-Baptiste Colbert did. In addition, you should also enlighten the “old world” employees/managers/entrepreneurs with the advantages of the near future that they had been ignoring for so long in order to create lasting value.
So ask yourselve, what’s yours passion and what can you add to this new world?



The #1 priority for a CEO is to decide, which project deserves the time and resources in order to achieve the best ROI. At this moment a lot of projects are still devoted to increase the efficiency and thus create a better ROI. The reason why social media projects are not of primary importance, is because the current CEOs has 28 reasons to be afraid of social media. Fortunately, the number of CEOs who “gets social media” is growing and therefore allocating more resources to interact with the customer via social media platforms.
Recently, I e-mailed with Robert Solleveld who is involved with the social media department of ING (link is in Dutch, but the reaction of ING at the bottom of the article is interesting) and asked him how he gained support for his projects, since the reality is that the CEOs has to be behind any project for it to receive the resources and commitment for it to ultimately succeed. He agreed that using the traditional ROI is hard and that the online customer feedback should be your primary focus to sustain the commitment and resources. In short, Robert’s answers shows close similarities with the ROI on social media (blocknotes 3), namely the return on ideas or even better the return on involvement.
Another good example is Greg Savage who is the CEO of Aquent ( a global recruitment company with nearly 70 offices worldwide). Greg is on twitter and has a blog to enhance his personal brand both off and online. Nevertheless, Greg is at this moment still in a minority as a social CEO, but this will change with a higher pace then you would expect.
For the record, this is not an attack on all CEOs, since you can’t blame them as it’s just a difference in attitude around content, transparency, interaction. Future CEOs will use social media platforms to listen and identify their online brand lovers as their most important stakeholder. Since, It’s proven that loyalty to a brand is derived from the level of identification that a customer can have with an representative of a company (CEO??) and thus not with the brand. Being authentic is therefore key for future CEOs, but this shouldn’t be hard when the passion of the CEO for a brand equals the passion of his customer.
I was therefore triggered by a quote on mashable from Forrester Research’s CEO George Colony. He said ““Eric Schmidt of Google is an infrequent Twitterer and is not a blogger; Steve Ballmer at Microsoft has no blog and no Twitter account; Michael Dell is on Twitter but is not an external blogger … Steve Jobs of Apple, and Larry Ellison of Oracle have no Twitter, Facebook , LinkedIn , or blog presences that we could find.” Off course, you can say people like Steve Jobs, don’t need a social media presence, since he is Steve Jobs and Apple is Apple. Secondly, we love the mystique around people like Steve jobs, nevertheless they should be aware that there is very little margin between the likeability and dislike-ability of a personal brand. In short, we are in the middle of the process from having non-social CEOs to social CEOs like Greg.
As CEOs are valued as big personalities, people would love to tweet with them as long as they have trust/newsworthy tweets and ones in a whole a critical view on their own company/performance in which he can consult his followers. In short, the future CEO can use:
CoTweet as his personal crowdsourcing platform to consult his followers as partial employees
Foursquare to meet your followers for an offline consultation session and invite nearby peers to join as well.
Twitter to share the discussion and publish the outcomes of the discussion. In addition, identify over time the community leaders, which you can value as spokesperson of a certain segment of your target group.
Hollrr to locate the innovators and early majority of your products, which you can value as your online pr agency.
43things to connect with new customers by assisting them in achieving their own personal goal.
Digg can be of use, since users on digg can choose the most newsworthy article posted by the users themselves. When you as a company appeal to them, a lot of free publicity can be generated via digg.
Tales of things to enable your existing customers to add their experience/story to the products you sell. Emotion is therefore included in the product, which makes it more appealing for new customers. Since it’s the story you tell and not the product you sell.
Facebook as a web shop, in which you let brand-lovers take control and hire them as “partial employees”. These brand-lovers will enable their friends to place widgets on their profile to spread the word of your company, but also earn a percentage on each endorsement that went via their profile. In short, use the social impact of your brand lovers to spread your message.
These platforms (and many more) can provide you with a new ideas for products and services based on the common input from your online brand-lovers or haters. However, when you are still wondering why a CEO should broaden his focus? It’s because otherwise the loyalty of brands will decline and we all will live in a market full of niches (however, you could question whether this would be a negative development. Good topic for my next post;)). The CEOs of the future will therefore not solely focus on efficiency projects, but also decide which social project deserves his or her support. The scope of future CEOs will thus become larger, but far more interesting from my perspective. Mmm, maybe now it becomes a career move to consider ;)

Social media usage in Brazil.
As Brazil is one of the BRIC countries, we have to keep a close eye on them. The Dutch company mediareis therefore went on a voyage to Brazil and find out how high the adoption is of social media platforms.
The results were that Orkut is number 1 followed by Twitter and Facebook.
Ps. If you are not familiar with Orkut, it’s Google equivalent of Facebook. You can find me as well at Mike de Block.
Take a look and see how Brazil is emerging on this level, or even surpassing some of our countries regarding the adoption of social media.
Tags: Orkut, facebook, twitter, Brazil, Social media,
The consequence of social media for every type of business is:

This phenomena roughly explains the initiatives in the current job market, like Annemarie Appelman (dutch) and Rene Boender’s experiment with 4 American student in their search for a job. In short, each student launched a blog and within 4 weeks they were hired by their desired companies, in which the highest investment was $ 10,00. I was flabbergasted, but immediately realized that this trend would soon become mainstream. Especially, if you take the picture above into account, in which stories like these would be spread around the world with a rapid pace. In short, the trend that job seekers can distinguish themselves by creating an online personal brand is innovative, but certainly not lasting.
Take for example the search I did on twitter for my dream-job “social media specialist”.

Off course this is a “hyped” position within a company (it’s no coincidence that this is my dream job;), but the applications are accessible for every twitter user. So let’s be honest, as an aspiring social media specialist, it’s becomes harder to position yourself as a specialist. Even if the adoption cycle of social media would be an roll’s royce engine, it still would be overheated.
The point I am trying to make is that the number 1 need for every job seeker is to stand out of the crowd. Nevertheless, none of the recruitment agencies offer online job seeding campaigns. Recruitment agency are slacking really hard and I hope you see as a recruiter the money that is lying in front of you. Still unsure what the hell mister Mike is talking about? Oke here it comes.
Social media campaigns from companies are seeded in order to trigger blogger’s to discuss a specific topic and create an online buzz. However, individuals are becoming online brands as well. In search for your dream-job you thus should not solely focus on your blog, but hire an recruitment agency that is seeding your personal brand on the web. However, I do not know whether a recruitment agency is offering this. Mmmm maybe I just found the market were I could lay out my expertise and leverage it into a nice 6 sum ROI;) Oh what the hell, let’s make use of the momentum, who would like to become a partner;)
Update 12-10-10: 8:19: Mashable wrote an article about the same topic. However, they have reversed the whole discussion, in which the job seeker should be aware how companies are posting jobs in this fast paced competitive world. Click on this link to read the whole article How job seekers may use social media in the future.

In my search for a job as a junior social media specialist, I recorded this job application video. The video will give you a better picture of who I am and why social media is my passion. In case you are looking for a social media specialist, please don’t hesitate to call/mail me as I would love to sit down and discuss the opportunities.
You can click on the links above in my description to get in contact with me, thanks!
At this moment an interesting discussion is taking place in Holland. A Dutch comedian is setting up a campaign against T-mobile, since they deliver crappy customer service. He asked his 40.000 twitter followers to share their frustrations with him in order to give T-mobile a wake-up call. However, this could apply for every company that is perceiving their customers as a number instead of a stakeholder.
Nevertheless, the story took a surprising turn as the focus shifted from T-Mobile to a Dutch social media/pr agency, named Buzzcapture. This company published a research and announced that the T-mobile brand is damaged by 100k or 200k. Nevertheless, on the (Dutch) Blog of Alexander Klopping the research is heavily questioned, since the consequences of the research are rather vague. He accused Buzzcapture to collect “some” numbers and afterwards made up some random consequences. As the consequences would be more then newsworthy and given the timing also relevant, it was likely that most journalist would copy the research and spread the story and thus also the brand of Buzzcapture.
Making use of the momentum with a (in)valid research could thus also backfire for a social media/pr agency. I therefore didn’t found the actions that the Dutch comedian undertook or the research from Backfire newsworthy, but the fact that readers are actually question themselves whether news is false or true. However, this is a direct result of negligent journalists who aren’t checking their sources. Nevertheless, this example once again underpins that it can backfire when irrelevant information is being spread. Journalist must be aware that it can backfire to publish false press-releases, solely with the purpose to be in the centre of attention for a short period. Social media users would like to engage in (real) conversations with a brand, but if denied or lie to they solely want (t-mobile or buzzcapture) blood.
Consumers aren’t stupid. In the contrary they become more knowledgable by the minute, so it’s time that journalist leave their ivory tower and value their readers as experts and engage.
Don’t say, I didn’t warned you;)
The social media internet browser: Rockmelt
gary:
Good Cop, Bad Cop, how Social Media and Traditional Media should work together
Tags: gary vee, social media,
Tom Marchant, co-founder of travel company Black Tomato about over-delivery and acts, not ads....
Grappig: de organogrammen van de grootste techbedrijven.
ahhh… Carla Gugino
Duracell: Brings Toys To Life… kinda scary
©2010–2012. Postage by Greg Cooper. Icons by PixelResort. Thanks to Jamie Cassidy & Panic.
*Unlikely to find your lost post using this but you can try...